Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases ; : 64-73, 2014.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-66605

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine the difference between the numbers of patients in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are eligible to TNF inhibitors by the past Korean National Health Insurance reimbursement guideline and by the disease activity score with 28-joint assessment (DAS28) based criteria. METHODS: Data were obtained from a multi-center registry for biologics users in Korean RA patients, BIOlogics Pharmacoepidemiologic StudY (BIOPSY). DAS28 was calculated based on either ESR or CRP, and DAS28 of more than 5.1 or between 3.2 and 5.1 with radiographic changes was defined as a cut-off point for the initiation of TNF inhibitors. For the maintenance criteria, we used both of improving in DAS28 score (>1.2) and low disease activity (DAS 28<3.2). Differences between the numbers in each step by two criteria were described with Chi-square test and Kappa agreement. RESULTS: Of the 489 patients in BIOPSY, 299 were included in this study. Among them, 278 patients (93.0%) were eligible of TNF inhibitors when we applied the new initiation criteria with DAS28-ESR, and 244 patients (81.6%) were indicated for TNF inhibitors with DAS28-CRP. For the maintenance criteria, a low disease activity (DAS28<3.2) in 3 months after starting TNF inhibitors is too strict for achieving (33.6% with DAS28-ESR and 50.0% with DAS28-CRP). Instead, decreasing DAS28 by more than 1.2 is more reasonable as a tool for deciding early responsiveness of TNF inhibitors in RA patients (81.2% both with DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the candidates for TNF inhibitors will be enormously changed according to a change in the reimbursement criteria. To define appropriate patients to receive TNF inhibitors, a further study with regard to the impact of changes in the reimbursement criteria on the outcomes of RA patients will be required.


Subject(s)
Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Biopsy , National Health Programs
2.
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases ; : 356-360, 2013.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-173305

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine clinical characteristics of Korean rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with clinically indications for TNF-alpha blocker, and to compare their clinical parameters with the Korean National Health Insurance reimbursement criteria. METHODS: Data were obtained from a registry of RA patients who visited rheumatology clinics of Hallym University affiliated hospitals. Among patients who were previously prescribed DMARDs for more than three months, rheumatologists selected patients clinically indicated for TNF-alpha blocker. The clinical characteristics at the time TNF-alpha blocker use was deemed indicated were examined. Radiographic damage was quantified by Modified Sharp van der Heijde score in hand and foot simple AP radiograph. RESULTS: From August 2010 to January 2013, five rheumatologists in four hospitals selected 109 patients clinically indicated for TNF-alpha blocker. When TNF-alpha blocker was considered, mean DAS28 was 5.2 (range 2.1~8.05), mean swollen joint count was 6 (range 0~22), mean tender joint count was 10.6 (range 0~28), mean ESR was 43.2 mm/hr (range 1~140) and mean CRP was 2.5 mg/dL (range 0.1~18.3). The mean total modified Sharp van der Heijde score was 32.72 (range 0~240). Eighty one percent of subjects did not have enough active joints to satisfy the Korean National Health Insurance reimbursement standard. CONCLUSION: Our results show that patients with clinically indications for TNF-alpha blocker had a broad range of disease activity and clinical parameters, and the majority did not meet the Korean National Health Insurance reimbursement criteria.


Subject(s)
Humans , Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Foot , Hand , Joints , National Health Programs , Rheumatology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
3.
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases ; : 334-340, 2012.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-176566

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine how many Korean rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients fulfilling the 2008 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendation, 2007 British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guideline and 2010 Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR) guideline for TNF-alpha blocker, meet the Korean National Health Insurance reimbursement criteria and to evaluate the reasons for failing the Korean National Health Insurance reimbursement criteria. METHODS: Data were obtained from a registry of RA patients who visited rheumatology clinics of Hallym university affiliated hospitals. Patients who were previously prescribed with methotrexate or leflunomide for more than 3 months and had at least one DAS28 examination were included in the present study. RESULTS: Of 642 patients included, 118 episodes meeting ACR guideline for using TNF-alpha blocker were identified in 88 patients (13.7%). In addition, 19 episodes meeting BSR guideline in 17 patients (2.6%) and 21 episodes meeting JCR guideline in 21 patients (6.2%) were identified. Four episodes (4.8%) meeting ACR recommendation, 0 episodes meeting BSR criteria and 5 episodes (12%) meeting JCR criteria, respectively, were eligible for TNF-alpha blocker according to the Korean National Health Insurance reimbursement guideline. The most common reason for failing the Korean National Health Insurance reimbursement criteria was the number of active joint counts (92.6%). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the majority of RA patients satisfying the ACR guideline, BSR and JCR guideline for use of the TNF-alpha blocker did not meet the Korean National Health Insurance reimbursement criteria. Patients most often failed due to active joint count criteria.


Subject(s)
Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Isoxazoles , Japan , Joints , Methotrexate , National Health Programs , Rheumatology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
4.
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health ; : 127-136, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-162769

ABSTRACT

The challenge facing the Korean National Health Insurance includes what to spend money on in order to elevate the 'value for money.' This article reviewed the changing issues associated with quality of care in the Korean health insurance system and envisioned a picture of an effective pay-for-performance (P4P) system in Korea taking into consideration quality of care and P4P systems in other countries. A review was made of existing systematic reviews and a recent Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development survey. An effective P4P in Korea was envisioned as containing three features: measures, basis for reward, and reward. The first priority is to develop proper measures for both efficiency and quality. For further improvement of quality indicators, an electronic system for patient history records should be built in the near future. A change in the level or the relative ranking seems more desirable than using absolute level alone for incentives. To stimulate medium- and small-scale hospitals to join the program in the next phase, it is suggested that the scope of application be expanded and the level of incentives adjusted. High-quality indicators of clinical care quality should be mapped out by combining information from medical claims and information from patient registries.


Subject(s)
National Health Programs , Program Development , Quality Improvement/economics , Quality of Health Care/economics , Reimbursement, Incentive/organization & administration , Republic of Korea
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL